Public statements to the contrary, things are not going smoothly when it comes to trade between the United States and India.
In the section on India, the annual ‘National Trade Estimate Report 2024’ on Foreign Trade Barriers, released last week by the US Trade Representative’s office, explains that “India’s tariff rates are announced with the annual budget and are modified on an ad hoc basis through notifications in the Gazette of India.”
“The tariff rates are subject to numerous exemptions that vary according to the product, user, intended use, or specific export promotion program.” The report suggests that “this renders India’s customs system complex and open to administrative discretion”
As a result, “U.S. companies have also faced extensive investigations related to their use of certain valuation methodologies when importing computer equipment… and have reported being subject to extensive searches and seizures of imports that do not appear to be risk-based.”
The requirement by India’s customs authority of extensive clearance documentation, the report says “often leads to lengthy processing delay.”
Multiple ministries mandating different procedures is another hassle that is highlighted in the report. “India lacks an overarching government procurement policy and, as a result, its government procurement practices and procedures vary among different ministries within the central government.”
The requirement of an “offset program” when it comes to India’s defence procurements, “which requires companies to invest 30 percent or more of the acquisition cost of contracts above the threshold value in Indian-produced parts, equipment, or services, continues to be challenging for manufacturers of high-technology equipment to meet given changing rules and limited opportunities.”
US stakeholders’ perception of India’s overall intellectual property (IP) regime is negative, mainly because patent applicants “continue to face long waiting periods to receive patent grants, and excessive reporting requirements.”
“Concerns remain with respect to whether Indian authorities will treat as confidential sensitive business information that parties are required to disclose on the current “Statement of Working of Patents” (Form 27).”
When it comes to satellite based services in India, the report bemoans the lack of an ‘Open Skies” Policy and suggests that Indian policy of taking a commission on any foreign satellite feed used kicks up the total cost and reduces consumers’ flexibility:
“Direct To Home (DTH) licensees must procure satellite capacity through Antrix, the commercial arm of the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO), which in turn only permits foreign procurements if it does not have available capacity on Indian satellites. When ISRO does permit the use of foreign satellite capacity, the foreign satellite operator must sell the capacity to ISRO, which in turn resells the capacity to the end-user with a surcharge.”
Published annually since 1985, this year’s NTE Report covers significant foreign trade barriers in 59 markets. Releasing the report, United States Trade Representative Katherine Tai said, “We respect that each government—including our own—has the sovereign right to govern in the public interest and to regulate for legitimate public policy reasons.” She underlines the intent to make it a “useful document that enumerates significant trade barriers that could be addressed to expand market opportunities and help our economy grow.”
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Comments
Start the conversation
Become a member of New India Abroad to start commenting.
Sign Up Now
Already have an account? Login